DBA Data[Home] [Help]

APPS.JAI_CMN_RCV_MATCHING_PKG dependencies on JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

Line 29: Quantity available is calculated as JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.quantity_received - quantity that is matched, but it not

25: errbuf, p_organization_id, p_customer_id, p_order_type_id, p_delivery_id,
26: p_delivery_detail_id, p_order_header_id, p_line_number
27:
28: 2 13/12/2002 cbabu for Bug# 2689425, FileVersion# 615.2
29: Quantity available is calculated as JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.quantity_received - quantity that is matched, but it not
30: including the RTV quantity, that is calculating wrongly. Changes made
31: Quantity Available is modified to be calculated as
32: ( JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.qty_to_adjust - deliver quantity matched with receipt but not ship confirmed )
33:

Line 32: ( JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.qty_to_adjust - deliver quantity matched with receipt but not ship confirmed )

28: 2 13/12/2002 cbabu for Bug# 2689425, FileVersion# 615.2
29: Quantity available is calculated as JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.quantity_received - quantity that is matched, but it not
30: including the RTV quantity, that is calculating wrongly. Changes made
31: Quantity Available is modified to be calculated as
32: ( JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.qty_to_adjust - deliver quantity matched with receipt but not ship confirmed )
33:
34: 3. 08-Jun-2005 Version 116.2 jai_cmn_rcv_mach -Object is Modified to refer to New DB Entity names in place of Old DB Entity Names
35: as required for CASE COMPLAINCE.
36:

Line 104: SELECT * FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

100: --then it becomes a performance issue.
101: CURSOR c_receipts_for_item( p_organization_id IN NUMBER,
102: p_location_id IN NUMBER,
103: p_inventory_item_id IN NUMBER) IS
104: SELECT * FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
105: WHERE organization_id = p_organization_id
106: AND location_id = p_location_id
107: AND inventory_item_id = p_inventory_item_id
108: AND qty_to_adjust > 0

Line 531: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

527: -- WHERE Customer_Trx_Line_Id = p_ref_line_id;
528:
529: CURSOR Excise_Duty_Rate_Cur IS
530: SELECT rate_per_unit ,PRIMARY_UOM_CODE
531: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
532: WHERE register_id = p_receipt_id;
533:
534: Cursor C_op_dtl is
535: Select order_um1,exchange_rate,item_id

Line 1164: from JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

1160: AND c.tax_id = b.tax_id
1161: AND (c.shipment_line_id,a.line_location_id) = (SELECT shipment_line_id,po_line_location_id
1162: FROM rcv_transactions
1163: WHERE transaction_id = (select receipt_ref
1164: from JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
1165: where register_id = p_receipt_id))
1166: ORDER BY c.tax_line_no;
1167: --End addition by Vijay on 09-Oct-2001 for TAR# 9445972.700
1168:

Line 1651: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

1647: -- ssumaith - removed the + additional_cvd in the above line
1648: receipt_num ,
1649: decode(quantity_received ,0,1,quantity_received) quantity_received -- ,
1650: --other_tax_credit / decode(quantity_received ,0,1,quantity_received) -- bug#4111609
1651: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
1652: WHERE register_id = p_receipt_id;
1653:
1654: CURSOR cur_cess_Duty_Rate_Cur IS/*Bug 5989740 bduvarag*/
1655: SELECT tax_type , credit

Line 1696: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

1692:
1693:
1694: CURSOR c_ed_cess_tax_check(cp_shipment_line_id IN NUMBER) IS
1695: SELECT 1
1696: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
1697: WHERE register_id = p_transaction_id
1698: AND nvl(other_tax_credit,0) <> 0;
1699:
1700: ln_order_line_id NUMBER(15);

Line 1824: Here if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is <> 0 then the tax_rate and precedences can be assigned as null

1820: Excise Education cess taxes are not being recalculated correctly in some cases.
1821:
1822: Reason:-
1823: This is a enhancement to the existing education cess code
1824: Here if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is <> 0 then the tax_rate and precedences can be assigned as null
1825: and the tax rate need not be considered.
1826: However if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is = 0 then the tax rate needs to be considered for recalculation.
1827:
1828: Fix:-

Line 1826: However if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is = 0 then the tax rate needs to be considered for recalculation.

1822: Reason:-
1823: This is a enhancement to the existing education cess code
1824: Here if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is <> 0 then the tax_rate and precedences can be assigned as null
1825: and the tax rate need not be considered.
1826: However if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is = 0 then the tax rate needs to be considered for recalculation.
1827:
1828: Fix:-
1829: Modified the code to set the tax rate and precedences according to the other_tax_rate column in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs based on a IF condition.
1830:

Line 1829: Modified the code to set the tax rate and precedences according to the other_tax_rate column in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs based on a IF condition.

1825: and the tax rate need not be considered.
1826: However if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is = 0 then the tax rate needs to be considered for recalculation.
1827:
1828: Fix:-
1829: Modified the code to set the tax rate and precedences according to the other_tax_rate column in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs based on a IF condition.
1830:
1831: Dependency Introduced due to this bug:-
1832: None
1833: 8 08/05/2007 Made changes for InterOrg bug 6030615

Line 2396: ||other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is not null

2392: || Code modified by aiyer for the bug 4539813
2393: */
2394: IF nvl(ln_cess_duty_rate,0) <> 0 THEN
2395: /*
2396: ||other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is not null
2397: */
2398: tax_rate_tab(rec.lno) := -1;
2399: P1(rec.lno) := -1;
2400: P2(rec.lno) := -1;