APPS.JAI_PO_TAX_PKG dependencies on JAI_GENERAL_PKG

Line 27: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

23: during tax defaultation in PO.
24: Issue in Procedure Ja_In_Po_Case2.
25: The calculation of vat assesseble value was wrong. The vat amount is
26: now multiplied with the quantity if the function
27: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
28: returns a not null value. Else the line amount is assigned as
29: the VAT amount.
30: 28-Jul-2005 Bug 4520049. Added by Lakshmi Gopalsami Version 120.4
31: Added nvl for v_temp_price while calling

Line 32: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

28: returns a not null value. Else the line amount is assigned as
29: the VAT amount.
30: 28-Jul-2005 Bug 4520049. Added by Lakshmi Gopalsami Version 120.4
31: Added nvl for v_temp_price while calling
32: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
33: in procedure copy_agreement_Taxes
34:
35: Dependency Due to this bug :-
36: None

Line 2603: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value (

2599: END IF;
2600:
2601: /* Begin - Bug#4250072 - Added by rallamse for VAT */
2602:
2603: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value (
2604: p_party_id => v_vendor_id,
2605: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
2606: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
2607: p_uom_code => v_uom,

Line 5726: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

5722: OPEN cur_item;
5723: FETCH cur_item INTO lv_item_id;
5724: CLOSE cur_item;
5725:
5726: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
5727: ( p_party_id => vendor_rec.vendor_id,
5728: p_party_site_id => vendor_rec.vendor_site_id,
5729: p_inventory_item_id => lv_item_id,
5730: p_uom_code => p_unit_code,

Line 6252: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

6248: ( v_vendor_id, v_vendor_site_id,
6249: v_item_id, v_uom_code
6250: );
6251:
6252: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
6253: ( p_party_id => v_vendor_id,
6254: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
6255: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
6256: p_uom_code => v_uom_code,

Line 6522: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value /*Ravi*/

6518: v_assessable_value := v_assessable_value * v_qty;
6519: jai_po_cmn_pkg.Ja_In_Po_Func_Curr( v_po_hdr_id, v_assessable_value, v_doc_curr, v_curr_conv_factor ) ;
6520: END IF;
6521:
6522: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value /*Ravi*/
6523: ( p_party_id => v_vendor_id,
6524: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
6525: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
6526: p_uom_code => v_uom_code,

Line 6804: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

6800:
6801: --added, Harshita for bug #4245062
6802:
6803: ln_vat_assess_value :=
6804: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
6805: ( p_party_id => vendor_id,
6806: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
6807: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
6808: p_uom_code => v_uom,

Line 7269: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

7265: ln_vat_assess_value := p_vat_assess_value;
7266:
7267: IF NVL( ln_vat_assess_value, -9999 ) = -9999 THEN
7268: ln_vat_assess_value :=
7269: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
7270: ( p_party_id => v_vendor_id,
7271: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
7272: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
7273: p_uom_code => v_uom_code,