eTRM uses javascript that opens and focuses a separate window to display reports. Your browser does not appear to support javascript. This should not prevent you from using eTRM but it does mean the window focus feature will not work. Please check the contents of other windows on your desktop if you click on a link that does not appear to do anything.

APPS.CS_WORKFLOW_PUB dependencies on CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT

Line 134: --l_change_flags_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.audit_flags_rec_type;

130: l_initiator_role VARCHAR2(100);
131:
132: -- For audit record
133: -- This is obsolete. rmanabat 11/21/02
134: --l_change_flags_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.audit_flags_rec_type;
135:
136: l_service_request_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.service_request_rec_type;
137: l_notes CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.notes_table;
138: l_contacts CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.contacts_table;

Line 136: l_service_request_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.service_request_rec_type;

132: -- For audit record
133: -- This is obsolete. rmanabat 11/21/02
134: --l_change_flags_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.audit_flags_rec_type;
135:
136: l_service_request_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.service_request_rec_type;
137: l_notes CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.notes_table;
138: l_contacts CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.contacts_table;
139: l_object_version_number number;
140: l_interaction_id number;

Line 137: l_notes CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.notes_table;

133: -- This is obsolete. rmanabat 11/21/02
134: --l_change_flags_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.audit_flags_rec_type;
135:
136: l_service_request_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.service_request_rec_type;
137: l_notes CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.notes_table;
138: l_contacts CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.contacts_table;
139: l_object_version_number number;
140: l_interaction_id number;
141:

Line 138: l_contacts CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.contacts_table;

134: --l_change_flags_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.audit_flags_rec_type;
135:
136: l_service_request_rec CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.service_request_rec_type;
137: l_notes CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.notes_table;
138: l_contacts CS_SERVICEREQUEST_PVT.contacts_table;
139: l_object_version_number number;
140: l_interaction_id number;
141:
142:

Line 449: CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.Create_Audit_Record (

445:
446: -- Insert audit record
447: l_change_flags_rec.new_workflow := FND_API.G_TRUE;
448:
449: CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.Create_Audit_Record (
450: p_api_version => 2.0,
451: p_init_msg_list => FND_API.G_FALSE,
452: p_commit => FND_API.G_FALSE,
453: x_return_status => l_return_status,

Line 477: -- CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.initialize_rec(l_service_request_rec);

473: /**** the service request's workflow process id. This therefore ****/
474: /**** will not create an audit record for this update. Also, ****/
475: /**** the update API does not handle the p_called_by_workflow ****/
476: /**** anymore. rmanabat 032403 ****/
477: -- CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.initialize_rec(l_service_request_rec);
478:
479: -- NOtes :
480: -- We do not pass p-commit to true to the update SR, since
481: -- we are explicitly doing a commit here

Line 505: CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.Update_ServiceRequest

501: /**** the update API does not handle the p_called_by_workflow ****/
502: /**** anymore. rmanabat 032403 ****/
503:
504: /******************
505: CS_ServiceRequest_PVT.Update_ServiceRequest
506: ( p_api_version => 3.0, -- Changed from 2.0 for 11.5.9
507: p_init_msg_list => fnd_api.g_false,
508: p_commit => fnd_api.g_false,
509: p_validation_level => fnd_api.g_valid_level_full,