DBA Data[Home] [Help]

APPS.JAI_AP_ILA_TRIGGER_PKG SQL Statements

The following lines contain the word 'select', 'insert', 'update' or 'delete':

Line: 26

           update JAI_AP_MATCH_ERS_T
              set po_distribution_id = pr_new.po_distribution_id
            where invoice_id = pr_new.invoice_id
              and invoice_line_number = pr_new.line_number
              and po_distribution_id is null;
Line: 32

  jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After update trigger','Inside trigger after update');
Line: 34

   *Issue - "To Insert Tax Distributions" concurrent is not firing when invoice is
   *matched to PO using the "Quick Match" option in the invoice workbench.
   *Reason - po_distribution_id is null when row is inserted in ap_invoice_lines_all.
   *So the procedure ARI_T1 exits without firing the program.
    *Fix - Call the ARI_T1 procedure from ARU_T1 when the invoice source is not ERS.*/

   jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After update trigger','Value of invoice_id'||pr_new.invoice_id);
Line: 41

   SELECT source INTO lv_source
   FROM ap_invoices_all
   WHERE invoice_id = pr_new.invoice_id;
Line: 45

  jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After update trigger','Value of source is'||lv_source);
Line: 51

    jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After update trigger','Calling After insert trigger');
Line: 76

  SELECT currency_code
  FROM gl_sets_of_books
  WHERE set_of_books_id = c_sob;
Line: 81

  SELECT po_header_id,po_line_id
  FROM   rcv_transactions
  WHERE  transaction_id = v_rcv_trans_id;
Line: 86

  SELECT COUNT(*)
  FROM   JAI_AP_MATCH_INV_TAXES
  WHERE  po_header_id = v_po_header_id
  AND    po_line_id =  v_po_line_id
  AND    invoice_id =  v_invoice_id;
Line: 108

  SELECT SUBSTR(SUBSTR(invoice_num, INSTR(invoice_num, '-', 1, 1) + 1 ,
                             (INSTR(invoice_num, '-', 1, 2)-1) - INSTR(invoice_num, '-', 1, 1)
               ),1,30), Source
  FROM   ap_invoices_all
  WHERE  invoice_id = pr_new.Invoice_Id;
Line: 115

  SELECT Inventory_Organization_Id
  FROM   Hr_Locations
  WHERE  Location_Id = ( SELECT Ship_To_Location_Id
                         FROM   Po_Headers_All
                         WHERE  Po_Header_Id = ( SELECT Po_Header_Id
                                                 FROM   Po_Distributions_All
                                                 WHERE  Po_Distribution_Id = pr_new.Po_Distribution_Id
                                               )
                       );
Line: 126

  SELECT Shipment_Line_Id, Shipment_Header_Id
  FROM   Rcv_Shipment_Lines
  WHERE  Shipment_Header_Id IN ( SELECT Shipment_Header_Id
                                 FROM   Rcv_Shipment_Headers
                                 WHERE  Receipt_Num = receiptnum )
  AND    Po_Line_location_Id = ( SELECT Line_Location_Id
                                 FROM   Po_Distributions_All
                                 WHERE  Po_Distribution_Id = pr_new.Po_Distribution_Id )
 AND     To_Organization_Id = invorg;
Line: 137

  SELECT COUNT( Shipment_Line_Id )
  FROM   Rcv_Shipment_Lines
  WHERE  Shipment_Header_Id = v_shipment_header_id
  AND    To_Organization_Id = invorg;
Line: 144

  SELECT vendor_id, vendor_site_id
    , invoice_type_lookup_code, cancelled_date  -- cbabu for Bug# 2560026
  FROM   ap_invoices_all
  WHERE  invoice_id = inv_id;
Line: 150

  SELECT pay_on_code, pay_on_receipt_summary_code
  FROM   po_vendor_sites_all
  WHERE  vendor_id = ven_id
  AND    vendor_site_id = ven_site_id
  AND    NVL(org_id, 0) = NVL(v_org_id, 0);
Line: 157

  SELECT DISTINCT rsh.receipt_num, rsh.shipment_header_id
  FROM   rcv_shipment_headers rsh, rcv_transactions rt
  WHERE  rsh.shipment_header_id = rt.shipment_header_id
  AND    rsh.packing_slip = p_pck_slip
  AND    rsh.vendor_id = ven_id
  AND    rt.transaction_type = cpv_transaction_type;
Line: 208

                       Commented the call to concurrent for insert tax lines for pay_on_receipt option and populating
                       a temporary table instead, for avoiding a concurrent request for each item line for
                       performance issue.

7.       15-nov-2002   cbabu for Bug# 2665306, Version# 615.1
                        Following extra condition is added to stop firing 'India - To Insert Tax distributions'
                        concurrent AND (v_source NOT IN ('ERS', 'ASBN') ) As the data gets inserted into
                        JAI_AP_MATCH_ERS_T table that gets processed through the another concurrent for
                        inserting tax distributions during pay on receipt. And debug code is added to debug whenever
                        there are any issues.

8.       26-NOV-2002   cbabu for Bug# 2560026, Version# 615.2
                        another ELSIF condition (AP_INVOICES_ALL.invoice_type_lookup_code = 'DEBIT') is added to
                        default taxes when debit memo is auto created or matched with a PURCHASE ORDER or RECEIPT.
                        Based on transaction data following two ways are followed.

                        If AP_INVOICES_ALL.source = 'RTS' THEN 'ERS' functionality is invoked Otherwise PO, RECEIPT
                        Match functionality is invoked.

9.       23-DEC-2002  cbabu for Bug# 2717471, Version# 615.3
                      functionality is added to default the taxes for debit memo distribution line, when it is
                      matched with an invoice.

10.      08-apr-2003  Aparajita for bug#2851123. Version#615.4
                      The request JAINDIST was submitted wrongly. The seventh parameter in the submit request has to                                           be the po distributions id. It was being passed as transactions id in receipt matching cases.

11.      11-sep-2003  Vijay Shankar for bug#3138227. Version#616.1
                      The utl file related code is failing which is stopping the transaction to continue. If the utl file
                      opening fails, then v_debug has to be made 'N' so that the transaction goes on without any error

12      29-Nov-2004   Sanjikum for 4035297. Version 115.1
                      Changed the 'INR' check. Added the call to JA_IN_UTIL.CHECK_JAI_EXISTS

                      Dependency Due to this Bug:-
                      The current trigger becomes dependent on the function ja_in_util.check_jai_exists version 115.0.

13      24-mar-2005    Aparajita. Version#115.2. TDS Clean up Bug#4088186.
                       Removed the TDS related functionality from this trigger. It only caters to pulling
                       purchasing taxes to payables.

14.     17-AUG-2005    Brathod, Bug# 4557312, File Version 120.1
                       Issue:-  fnd_request.submit_request call for submitting concurrent JAINDIST was using
                                SQLAP as application which is JA in R12 as reason concurrent was trying to find
                                a procedure registered with SQLAP application which does not exist in
                                R12 code line
                    Solution:-  All the call to submit JAINDIST concurrent are modified to use JA
                                as application instead of SQLAP.

OBJECT RENAMED TO jai_ap_ida_t3.sql
-----------------------------------

14.     22-Jun-2005    Brathod, File Version 116.0
                       For CASE complaince objects are modified to refer to new db entity names
                       in place of old db entity names.

15      22-Jun-2005    Brathod, File Version 116.1
                       Object Modified For SQL Literal Changes

16      23-Jun-2005    Brathod, Filer Version 112.0, Bug# 4445989
                       -  Trigger on the table ap_invoice_distributions_all was obsoleted and new trigger (jai_ap_ila_ari_t1)
                          on table ap_invoice_lines_all is created by modifying the trigger code to use ap_invoice_lines_all.
                          Trigger is also reponsible to submit a concurrent JAINDIST.  Arguments to the concurrent is modified
                          so the call to concurrent is also modified to use invoice_line_number instead
                          of distribution_line_number

17     07/12/2005   Hjujjuru for the bug 4866533 File version 120.1
                    added the who columns in the insert into table JAI_AP_MATCH_ERS_T.
                    Dependencies Due to this bug:-
                    None

18    29-SEP-2011  Bug #12886913
 				   Issue :- TO INSERT TAX Distributions (India - To Insert Tax Distributions) concurrent
  				   is firing even when there are no taxes existing
				  Solution - Taking the count of po/receipt tax lines based on the match type and after checking
				  if the count is greater than zero then only firing the concurrent program

19.  22-Jan-2012  Bug 16100273 by amandali
                  Issue:TAXES ARE NOT FLOWING TO RECEIPT MATCHED INVOICE IN CASE OF PO HAVING MULTIPLE DISTRIBUTIONS
                  Fix:For receipt matched invoices having PO with multiple distributions, po_distribution_id would be null in ap_invoice_lines_all
                      Hence added po_header_id condition to process the same.

Future Dependencies For the release Of this Object:-
(Please add a row in the section below only if your bug introduces a dependency due to spec change/ A new call to a object/
A datamodel change )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Version    Current Bug    Dependent           Files                Version   Author   Date          Remarks
Of File                           On Bug/Patchset    Dependent On

jai_ap_ida_t3.sql
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
115.1              4035297        IN60105D2+4033992  ja_in_util_pkg_s.sql  115.0     Sanjikum 29-Nov-2004  Call to this function.
                                                     ja_in_util_pkg_s.sql  115.0   Sanjikum

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

18     20-Sep-2007   Bug#5990061. Added by vkantamn ,Version 120.8
		     Modified cursor fetch_recpt_num_cur.
		     Added substr when retrieving receipt number from invoice_num

19     08-Jan-2008    Modifed by Jason Liu for retroactive price

20     03-APR-2008      Jason Liu for bug#6918386
       Added PO Matched invoice case to insert tax lines for PPA invoice

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

21      23-Dec-2011     Modified by Qinglei for bug#13405876
        Added condition pr_new.po_distribution_id IS NOT NULL for ITEM_TO_RECEIPT match type.
        Because for Invoice Quick Match PO, when insert ap_invoice_lines_all, po_distribution_id is null
        and should not run CP "TO INSERT TAX Distributions (India - To Insert Tax Distributions)".
        The CP will just run when updateing ap_invoice_lines_all for Invoice Quick Match PO.
		09-nov-12  vkaranam for bug#14472181
		issue:Not able to generate the Debit memo matched to PO having multiple distributions
		Fix:

		added the pr_new.po_header_id is not null condition for PO matched debit memo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
  --IF JAI_CMN_UTILS_PKG.CHECK_JAI_EXISTS( p_calling_object  => 'JAIN_TDSTEMP_AFTERINSERT_TRG',
  --                                p_set_of_books_id => pr_new.set_of_books_id) = FALSE
  --THEN
  --  RETURN;
Line: 339

      SELECT DECODE(SUBSTR (value,1,INSTR(value,',') -1),NULL,
        Value,SUBSTR (value,1,INSTR(value,',') -1)) INTO v_utl_location
      FROM v$parameter
      WHERE name = lv_name;
Line: 345

      UTL_FILE.PUT_LINE(v_myfilehandle, '********* Start TdsTemp_AfterInsert_Trg ('||TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'DD/MM/RRRR HH24:MI:SS') ||') *********');
Line: 354

  jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Inside after insert trigger');
Line: 359

 jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Value of receipt_num is '||v_receipt_num);
Line: 360

 jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Value of source is '||v_source);
Line: 361

 jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Value of invoice_id is '||pr_new.invoice_id);
Line: 438

    UPDATE ap_invoices_all
    SET    invoice_amount = invoice_amount + DECODE(pr_new.amount,-1,1,1,-1)
    WHERE  invoice_id =  pr_new.invoice_id;
Line: 459

      SELECT 'Y'
	    INTO lv_rcpt_tax_exists
	    FROM DUAL
	  WHERE EXISTS (SELECT '1'
  	  			      FROM JAI_RCV_LINE_TAXES
 					 WHERE shipment_line_id IN (SELECT shipment_line_id
                              				      FROM RCV_TRANSACTIONS
							 					 WHERE po_header_id = pr_new.po_header_id
							   					   AND po_line_id = pr_new.po_line_id
							                       AND source_document_code = 'PO')
				   );
Line: 474

	    SELECT 'Y'
	    INTO lv_po_tax_exists
	    FROM DUAL
	  WHERE EXISTS (SELECT '1'
	                  FROM  JAI_PO_TAXES
					 WHERE po_header_id = pr_new.po_header_id
					   AND po_line_id = pr_new.po_line_id);
Line: 508

jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Value of invoice_id is '|| pr_new.invoice_id);
Line: 509

jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Value of po_distribution_id -> is '||pr_new.po_distribution_id);
Line: 510

jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Value of rcv_transacion_id -> is '||pr_new.rcv_transaction_id);
Line: 511

jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Value of match_type -> is '||pr_new.match_type);
Line: 512

jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Value of line_type_lookup_code -> '||pr_new.line_type_lookup_code);
Line: 513

jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Value of v_count_tax_dist -> '||v_count_tax_dist);
Line: 532

  /*For ASBN the po_distribution_id is getting updated later. So we are allowing the temp table to be populated
  even if the po_distribution_id is null and then updating when the update is happening*/
  IF (  ( pr_new.match_type = 'ITEM_TO_RECEIPT' AND
          pr_new.rcv_transaction_id IS NOT NULL AND
		  v_source in ('ERS','ASBN','SUPPLEMENT') )
		 OR
	    ( pr_new.match_type = 'ITEM_TO_PO'
		  AND
		  ( ( v_source in ('SUPPLEMENT') AND
		      pr_new.po_distribution_id IS NOT NULL )
			  or
			  v_source='ERS' /* added for bug 8259434 */
			  or
			  v_source ='ASBN' )
         )
	 ) and
     pr_new.line_type_lookup_code in ('ITEM', 'ACCRUAL') AND
     pr_new.amount >= 0 and
     v_count_tax_dist = 0
  THEN

    jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Inside condition 1');
Line: 556

    INSERT INTO JAI_AP_MATCH_ERS_T
  (
    invoice_id,
    invoice_line_number, -- Using Invoice_line_number instead of distribution_line_number for Bug# 4445989
    po_distribution_id,
    quantity_invoiced,
    shipment_header_id,
    receipt_num,
    receipt_code,
    rematching,
    rcv_transaction_id,
    amount,
    org_id,
    creation_date,
    -- added, Harshita for Bug 4866533
    created_by,
    last_updated_by,
    last_update_date
  )
    VALUES
    (
    pr_new.invoice_id,
    pr_new.line_number,  -- Using pr_new.line_number instead of pr_new.distribution_line_number, Bug# 4445989
    pr_new.po_distribution_id,
    pr_new.quantity_invoiced,
    v_shipment_header_id,
    v_receipt_num,
    v_receipt_code,
    v_rematching,
    pr_new.rcv_transaction_id,
    pr_new.amount,
    NVL(pr_new.org_id,0),
    SYSDATE,
    -- added, Harshita for Bug 4866533
    fnd_global.user_id,
    fnd_global.user_id,
    sysdate
    );
Line: 604

    jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Inside condition 2');
Line: 611

    'TO INSERT TAX Distributions',
    '',
    FALSE,
    pr_new.invoice_id,
    pr_new.line_number,  -- Using line_number instead of Distribution_line_number, Bug# 4445989
    pr_new.po_distribution_id,
    pr_new.quantity_invoiced,
    v_shipment_header_id,
    v_receipt_num,
    v_receipt_code,
    v_rematching,
    pr_new.rcv_transaction_id,
    pr_new.amount,
    NVL(pr_new.org_id,0),
    pr_new.project_id,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.task_id,     -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_type,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_organization_id, -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_item_date -- 5876390, 6012570
    );
Line: 645

    jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Inside condition 3');
Line: 652

    'TO INSERT TAX Distributions',
    '',
    FALSE,
    pr_new.invoice_id,
    pr_new.line_number,  -- Using Line_Number instead of Distribution_Line_Number, Bug#4445989
    pr_new.po_distribution_id,-- pr_new.rcv_transaction_id, commented by Aparajita for bug#2851123
    pr_new.quantity_invoiced,
    v_shipment_header_id,
    v_receipt_num,
    v_receipt_code,
    v_rematching,
    pr_new.rcv_transaction_id,
    pr_new.amount,
    NVL(pr_new.org_id,0),
    pr_new.project_id,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.task_id,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_type,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_organization_id,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_item_date
    );
Line: 681

    jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Inside condition 4');
Line: 688

    'TO INSERT TAX Distributions',
    '',
    FALSE,
    pr_new.invoice_id,
    pr_new.line_number, -- Using Line_Number instead of Distribution_Line_Number,Bug# 4445989
    pr_new.po_distribution_id,
    pr_new.quantity_invoiced,
    v_shipment_header_id,
    v_receipt_num,
    v_receipt_code,
    v_rematching,
    pr_new.rcv_transaction_id,
    pr_new.amount,
    NVL(pr_new.org_id,0),
    pr_new.project_id,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.task_id,     -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_type,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_organization_id,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_item_date -- 5876390, 6012570
    );
Line: 719

    jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Inside condition 5');
Line: 722

    jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Inside condition of RTS');
Line: 725

    INSERT INTO JAI_AP_MATCH_ERS_T (
      invoice_id, invoice_line_number,  -- Bug# 4445989
      po_distribution_id, quantity_invoiced,  shipment_header_id,
      receipt_num, receipt_code, rematching,
      rcv_transaction_id, amount, org_id, creation_date,
      -- added, Harshita for Bug 4866533
      created_by, last_updated_by, last_update_date
    ) VALUES (
      pr_new.invoice_id, pr_new.line_number,  -- Bug# 4445989
      pr_new.po_distribution_id, pr_new.quantity_invoiced, v_shipment_header_id,
      v_receipt_num, v_receipt_code, v_rematching,
      pr_new.rcv_transaction_id, pr_new.amount,NVL(pr_new.org_id,0), SYSDATE,
      -- added, Harshita for Bug 4866533
      fnd_global.user_id, fnd_global.user_id, sysdate
    );
Line: 743

    jai_cmn_utils_pkg.write_fnd_log_msg('After insert trigger','Inside condition of Manual entry');
Line: 781

        'JAINDIST', 'To INSERT TAX Distributions', '', FALSE,
        pr_new.invoice_id, pr_new.line_number, -- Bug#4445989
        pr_new.po_distribution_id, pr_new.quantity_invoiced,
        v_shipment_header_id, v_receipt_num,  v_receipt_code,  v_rematching,
        pr_new.rcv_transaction_id, pr_new.amount,NVL(pr_new.org_id,0),
         pr_new.project_id, pr_new.task_id,pr_new.expenditure_type          -- 5876390, 6012570
        , pr_new.expenditure_organization_id, pr_new.expenditure_item_date -- 5876390, 6012570
      );
Line: 813

    'TO INSERT TAX Distributions',
    '',
    FALSE,
    pr_new.invoice_id,
    pr_new.line_number,  -- Using Line_Number instead of Distribution_Line_Number, Bug#4445989
    pr_new.po_distribution_id,-- pr_new.rcv_transaction_id, commented by Aparajita for bug#2851123
    pr_new.quantity_invoiced,
    v_shipment_header_id,
    v_receipt_num,
    v_receipt_code,
    v_rematching,
    pr_new.rcv_transaction_id,
    pr_new.amount,
    NVL(pr_new.org_id,0),
    pr_new.project_id,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.task_id,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_type,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_organization_id,  -- 5876390, 6012570
    pr_new.expenditure_item_date
    );
Line: 845

	   Pv_return_message  := 'No IL tax exist for the matched line so skipping the call to the India tax insert concurrent request '  || substr(sqlerrm,1,1900);