DBA Data[Home] [Help]

APPS.JAI_CMN_RCV_MATCHING_PKG dependencies on JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

Line 29: Quantity available is calculated as JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.quantity_received - quantity that is matched, but it not

25: errbuf, p_organization_id, p_customer_id, p_order_type_id, p_delivery_id,
26: p_delivery_detail_id, p_order_header_id, p_line_number
27:
28: 2 13/12/2002 cbabu for Bug# 2689425, FileVersion# 615.2
29: Quantity available is calculated as JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.quantity_received - quantity that is matched, but it not
30: including the RTV quantity, that is calculating wrongly. Changes made
31: Quantity Available is modified to be calculated as
32: ( JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.qty_to_adjust - deliver quantity matched with receipt but not ship confirmed )
33:

Line 32: ( JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.qty_to_adjust - deliver quantity matched with receipt but not ship confirmed )

28: 2 13/12/2002 cbabu for Bug# 2689425, FileVersion# 615.2
29: Quantity available is calculated as JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.quantity_received - quantity that is matched, but it not
30: including the RTV quantity, that is calculating wrongly. Changes made
31: Quantity Available is modified to be calculated as
32: ( JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS.qty_to_adjust - deliver quantity matched with receipt but not ship confirmed )
33:
34: 3. 08-Jun-2005 Version 116.2 jai_cmn_rcv_mach -Object is Modified to refer to New DB Entity names in place of Old DB Entity Names
35: as required for CASE COMPLAINCE.
36:

Line 163: SELECT * FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

159: --then it becomes a performance issue.
160: CURSOR c_receipts_for_item( p_organization_id IN NUMBER,
161: p_location_id IN NUMBER,
162: p_inventory_item_id IN NUMBER) IS
163: SELECT * FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
164: WHERE organization_id = p_organization_id
165: AND location_id = p_location_id
166: AND inventory_item_id = p_inventory_item_id
167: AND qty_to_adjust > 0

Line 590: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

586: -- WHERE Customer_Trx_Line_Id = p_ref_line_id;
587:
588: CURSOR Excise_Duty_Rate_Cur IS
589: SELECT rate_per_unit ,PRIMARY_UOM_CODE
590: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
591: WHERE register_id = p_receipt_id;
592:
593: Cursor C_op_dtl is
594: Select order_um1,exchange_rate,item_id

Line 1223: from JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

1219: AND c.tax_id = b.tax_id
1220: AND (c.shipment_line_id,a.line_location_id) = (SELECT shipment_line_id,po_line_location_id
1221: FROM rcv_transactions
1222: WHERE transaction_id = (select receipt_ref
1223: from JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
1224: where register_id = p_receipt_id))
1225: ORDER BY c.tax_line_no;
1226: --End addition by Vijay on 09-Oct-2001 for TAR# 9445972.700
1227:

Line 1746: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

1742: -- ssumaith - removed the + additional_cvd in the above line
1743: receipt_num ,
1744: decode(DECODE( TRANSACTION_TYPE, 'MCR', oth_receipt_quantity,quantity_received) ,0,1,DECODE( TRANSACTION_TYPE, 'MCR', oth_receipt_quantity,quantity_received)) quantity_received -- added the decode transaction_type for bug8366387 ,
1745: --other_tax_credit / decode(quantity_received ,0,1,quantity_received) -- bug#4111609
1746: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
1747: WHERE register_id = p_receipt_id;
1748:
1749: CURSOR cur_cess_Duty_Rate_Cur IS/*Bug 5989740 bduvarag*/
1750: SELECT tax_type , credit

Line 1791: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS

1787:
1788:
1789: CURSOR c_ed_cess_tax_check(cp_shipment_line_id IN NUMBER) IS
1790: SELECT 1
1791: FROM JAI_CMN_RG_23D_TRXS
1792: WHERE register_id = p_transaction_id
1793: AND nvl(other_tax_credit,0) <> 0;
1794:
1795: ln_order_line_id NUMBER(15);

Line 1919: Here if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is <> 0 then the tax_rate and precedences can be assigned as null

1915: Excise Education cess taxes are not being recalculated correctly in some cases.
1916:
1917: Reason:-
1918: This is a enhancement to the existing education cess code
1919: Here if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is <> 0 then the tax_rate and precedences can be assigned as null
1920: and the tax rate need not be considered.
1921: However if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is = 0 then the tax rate needs to be considered for recalculation.
1922:
1923: Fix:-

Line 1921: However if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is = 0 then the tax rate needs to be considered for recalculation.

1917: Reason:-
1918: This is a enhancement to the existing education cess code
1919: Here if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is <> 0 then the tax_rate and precedences can be assigned as null
1920: and the tax rate need not be considered.
1921: However if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is = 0 then the tax rate needs to be considered for recalculation.
1922:
1923: Fix:-
1924: Modified the code to set the tax rate and precedences according to the other_tax_rate column in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs based on a IF condition.
1925:

Line 1924: Modified the code to set the tax rate and precedences according to the other_tax_rate column in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs based on a IF condition.

1920: and the tax rate need not be considered.
1921: However if the other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is = 0 then the tax rate needs to be considered for recalculation.
1922:
1923: Fix:-
1924: Modified the code to set the tax rate and precedences according to the other_tax_rate column in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs based on a IF condition.
1925:
1926: Dependency Introduced due to this bug:-
1927: None
1928: 8 08/05/2007 Made changes for InterOrg bug 6030615

Line 2561: ||other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is not null

2557: || Code modified by aiyer for the bug 4539813
2558: */
2559: IF nvl(ln_cess_duty_rate,0) <> 0 THEN
2560: /*
2561: ||other_tax_credit in jai_cmn_rg_23d_trxs is not null
2562: */
2563: tax_rate_tab(rec.lno) := -1;
2564: P1(rec.lno) := -1;
2565: P2(rec.lno) := -1;