APPS.JAI_PO_TAX_PKG dependencies on JAI_GENERAL_PKG

Line 27: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

23: during tax defaultation in PO.
24: Issue in Procedure Ja_In_Po_Case2.
25: The calculation of vat assesseble value was wrong. The vat amount is
26: now multiplied with the quantity if the function
27: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
28: returns a not null value. Else the line amount is assigned as
29: the VAT amount.
30: 28-Jul-2005 Bug 4520049. Added by Lakshmi Gopalsami Version 120.4
31: Added nvl for v_temp_price while calling

Line 32: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

28: returns a not null value. Else the line amount is assigned as
29: the VAT amount.
30: 28-Jul-2005 Bug 4520049. Added by Lakshmi Gopalsami Version 120.4
31: Added nvl for v_temp_price while calling
32: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
33: in procedure copy_agreement_Taxes
34:
35: Dependency Due to this bug :-
36: None

Line 3331: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value (

3327: END IF;
3328:
3329: /* Begin - Bug#4250072 - Added by rallamse for VAT */
3330:
3331: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value (
3332: p_party_id => v_vendor_id,
3333: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
3334: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
3335: p_uom_code => v_uom,

Line 7120: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

7116: OPEN cur_item;
7117: FETCH cur_item INTO lv_item_id;
7118: CLOSE cur_item;
7119:
7120: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
7121: ( p_party_id => vendor_rec.vendor_id,
7122: p_party_site_id => vendor_rec.vendor_site_id,
7123: p_inventory_item_id => lv_item_id,
7124: p_uom_code => p_unit_code,

Line 7674: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

7670: ( v_vendor_id, v_vendor_site_id,
7671: v_item_id, v_uom_code
7672: );
7673:
7674: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
7675: ( p_party_id => v_vendor_id,
7676: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
7677: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
7678: p_uom_code => v_uom_code,

Line 7969: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value /*Ravi*/

7965: v_assessable_value := v_assessable_value * v_qty;
7966: jai_po_cmn_pkg.Ja_In_Po_Func_Curr( v_po_hdr_id, v_assessable_value, v_doc_curr, v_curr_conv_factor ) ;
7967: END IF;
7968:
7969: ln_vat_assess_value := jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value /*Ravi*/
7970: ( p_party_id => v_vendor_id,
7971: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
7972: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
7973: p_uom_code => v_uom_code,

Line 8287: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

8283:
8284: --added, Harshita for bug #4245062
8285:
8286: ln_vat_assess_value :=
8287: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
8288: ( p_party_id => vendor_id,
8289: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
8290: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
8291: p_uom_code => v_uom,

Line 8819: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value

8815: ln_vat_assess_value := p_vat_assess_value;
8816:
8817: IF NVL( ln_vat_assess_value, -9999 ) = -9999 THEN
8818: ln_vat_assess_value :=
8819: jai_general_pkg.ja_in_vat_assessable_value
8820: ( p_party_id => v_vendor_id,
8821: p_party_site_id => v_vendor_site_id,
8822: p_inventory_item_id => v_item_id,
8823: p_uom_code => v_uom_code,