APPS.PO_MULTI_MOD_PVT dependencies on PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL

Line 498: PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.Copy_User_Attrs(

494: END;
495:
496: l_ags_table := PO_TBL_VARCHAR30(l_doc_num_ag_name);
497:
498: PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.Copy_User_Attrs(
499: x_template_id => p_template_id,
500: x_from_pk_col_value_pairs => EGO_COL_NAME_VALUE_PAIR_ARRAY(
501: EGO_COL_NAME_VALUE_PAIR_OBJ( 'PO_HEADER_ID' , p_po_header_id),
502: EGO_COL_NAME_VALUE_PAIR_OBJ( 'DRAFT_ID' , -1)

Line 516: debug(d_module, d_position, 'An exception was encountered in PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.Copy_User_Attrs: '||l_msg_data, FND_API.G_TRUE);

512: x_msg_data => l_msg_data
513: );
514:
515: IF (x_return_status <> fnd_api.g_ret_sts_success) THEN
516: debug(d_module, d_position, 'An exception was encountered in PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.Copy_User_Attrs: '||l_msg_data, FND_API.G_TRUE);
517: RAISE FND_API.g_exc_unexpected_error;
518: END IF;
519:
520: d_position := 30;

Line 526: PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.Copy_User_Attrs(

522:
523: --We should not copy the Multi-Mod Address usages. They will be merged later
524: l_ags_table := PO_TBL_VARCHAR30(l_address_ag_name);
525:
526: PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.Copy_User_Attrs(
527: x_template_id => p_template_id,
528: x_from_pk_col_value_pairs => EGO_COL_NAME_VALUE_PAIR_ARRAY(
529: EGO_COL_NAME_VALUE_PAIR_OBJ( 'PO_HEADER_ID' , p_multi_mod_request_record.uda_key_po_header_id),
530: EGO_COL_NAME_VALUE_PAIR_OBJ( 'DRAFT_ID' , p_multi_mod_request_record.uda_key_draft_id)

Line 559: debug(d_module, d_position, 'An exception was encountered in PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.Copy_User_Attrs: '||l_msg_data, FND_API.G_TRUE);

555: AND draft_id = p_draft_id
556: AND c_ext_attr39 NOT IN ('MOD_ADMIN_OFFICE', 'MOD_ISSUING_OFFICE');
557:
558: IF (x_return_status <> fnd_api.g_ret_sts_success) THEN
559: debug(d_module, d_position, 'An exception was encountered in PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.Copy_User_Attrs: '||l_msg_data, FND_API.G_TRUE);
560: RAISE FND_API.g_exc_unexpected_error;
561: END IF;
562:
563: d_position := 40;

Line 1862: p_object_name => PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.g_object_dff_tl(l_entity_code).l_object_name,

1858: debug(d_module, d_position, 'Calling ' || d_called_api || ' to fetch Supplier AG Attributes', FND_API.G_TRUE);
1859:
1860: EGO_USER_ATTRS_DATA_PUB.Get_User_Attrs_Data(
1861: p_api_version => 1.0,
1862: p_object_name => PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.g_object_dff_tl(l_entity_code).l_object_name,
1863: p_pk_column_name_value_pairs => l_pk_column_name_value_pairs,
1864: p_attr_group_request_table => l_attr_group_request_table,
1865: x_attributes_row_table => l_attributes_row_table,
1866: x_attributes_data_table => l_attr_name_value_pairs,

Line 1976: l_base_object_name := PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.g_object_dff_tl(l_entity_code).l_object_name;

1972: END IF;--IF(p_multi_mod_request_type = d_change_type_vendor_name)
1973:
1974: IF x_return_status = FND_API.G_RET_STS_SUCCESS THEN
1975: --Need to populate the UDA data back (Sync the new defaults with existing)
1976: l_base_object_name := PO_UDA_DATA_UTIL.g_object_dff_tl(l_entity_code).l_object_name;
1977:
1978: d_position := 120;
1979: d_called_api := 'EGO_USER_ATTRS_DATA_PUB.Process_User_Attrs_Data';
1980: debug(d_module, d_position, 'Calling ' || d_called_api || ' to populate the updated Supplier Attrs', FND_API.G_TRUE);