eTRM uses javascript that opens and focuses a separate window to display reports. Your browser does not appear to support javascript. This should not prevent you from using eTRM but it does mean the window focus feature will not work. Please check the contents of other windows on your desktop if you click on a link that does not appear to do anything.

APPS.JAI_PO_RLA_TRIGGER_PKG dependencies on JAI_PO_TAX_PKG

Line 745: /* jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_requisition_line_id , v_requisition_header_id, NULL,

741: FETCH Fetch_Uom_Code_Cur INTO v_uom_code;
742: CLOSE Fetch_Uom_Code_Cur;
743: /*4281841...end*/
744:
745: /* jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_requisition_line_id , v_requisition_header_id, NULL,
746: v_line_quantity, v_unit_price*v_line_quantity, NVL( v_currency, v_hdr_currency ) ,
747: v_assessable_value, v_assessable_value, NULL, conv_rate ); */
748:
749: /* ELSE -- pramasub FP commented

Line 789: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION_BLANKET', v_requisition_line_id , v_po_line_id, v_line_location_id,

785: END LOOP;
786: end if; -- added by sriram -- Bug # 2977200
787:
788: END IF;*/
789: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION_BLANKET', v_requisition_line_id , v_po_line_id, v_line_location_id,
790: v_line_quantity, v_unit_price*v_line_quantity, NVL( v_currency, v_hdr_currency ) ,
791: v_assessable_value, v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, NULL, conv_rate ); -- Ravi for VAT*/ --pramasub FP commented
792: --ja_in_po_calc_tax is renamed to jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax
793: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION_BLANKET',

Line 792: --ja_in_po_calc_tax is renamed to jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax

788: END IF;*/
789: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION_BLANKET', v_requisition_line_id , v_po_line_id, v_line_location_id,
790: v_line_quantity, v_unit_price*v_line_quantity, NVL( v_currency, v_hdr_currency ) ,
791: v_assessable_value, v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, NULL, conv_rate ); -- Ravi for VAT*/ --pramasub FP commented
792: --ja_in_po_calc_tax is renamed to jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax
793: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION_BLANKET',
794: p_header_id => v_blanket_hdr,
795: p_requisition_line_id => v_requisition_line_id ,
796: P_line_id => v_po_line_id,

Line 793: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION_BLANKET',

789: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION_BLANKET', v_requisition_line_id , v_po_line_id, v_line_location_id,
790: v_line_quantity, v_unit_price*v_line_quantity, NVL( v_currency, v_hdr_currency ) ,
791: v_assessable_value, v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, NULL, conv_rate ); -- Ravi for VAT*/ --pramasub FP commented
792: --ja_in_po_calc_tax is renamed to jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax
793: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION_BLANKET',
794: p_header_id => v_blanket_hdr,
795: p_requisition_line_id => v_requisition_line_id ,
796: P_line_id => v_po_line_id,
797: p_line_location_id => v_line_location_id,

Line 1195: This is resolved by defaulting taxes from setup with an API call to jai_po_tax_pkg.ja_in_po_case2 procedure

1191:
1192: 5 18/11/2003 Vijay Shankar for Bug# 3193592, FileVersion# 617.1
1193: when multiple requisitions are merged to form a single PO Shipment during Autocreation process, then this trigger
1194: is erroring out as taxes from multiple requisition lines are getting populated into the same line_location_id.
1195: This is resolved by defaulting taxes from setup with an API call to jai_po_tax_pkg.ja_in_po_case2 procedure
1196: instead of carrying taxes from requisition lines to PO Shipment
1197:
1198: 6.02/08/2004 ssumaith - bug# 3729015 file version 115.1
1199: commented call to jai_po_cmn_pkg.process_release_shipment because in the ja_in_po_tax_insert_trg

Line 1254: In procedure ARU_T1, when jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax is invoked, Assessable value

1250: 16. 10-Sep-2010 Jia for GST Bug#10091373.
1251:
1252: 17. 19-Apr-2011 Xiao for bug#12344603
1253: Issue: Exclusive tax amount is incorrect in autocreate po flow,
1254: In procedure ARU_T1, when jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax is invoked, Assessable value
1255: is passed as line amount to calculate taxes.
1256: Fixed: In fact, line amount should be passed to calculate tax as basis.
1257:
1258: ===============================================================================

Line 1540: jai_po_tax_pkg.ja_in_po_case2(v_type_lookup_code,

1536: FETCH c_inventory_org_id INTO v_inventory_org_id;
1537: CLOSE c_inventory_org_id;
1538:
1539:
1540: jai_po_tax_pkg.ja_in_po_case2(v_type_lookup_code,
1541: v_quot_class_code,
1542: v_po_vendor_id,
1543: v_po_vendor_site_id,
1544: v_po_curr,

Line 1798: jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'STANDARDPO',

1794:
1795: jai_po_cmn_pkg.Ja_In_Po_Func_Curr( v_po_hdr_id, DUMMY, v_po_curr, v_curr_conv_factor); -- TO get the conversion rate .
1796:
1797: /* Added ln_vat_assess_value for bug# for VAT */
1798: jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'STANDARDPO',
1799: v_po_hdr_id ,
1800: v_po_line_id,
1801: v_line_loc_id,
1802: -- Bug 4513549. Added by LGOPALSA

Line 2031: Call to jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax is not invoked properly, which is made proper with this fix

2027: FETCH Fetch_Book_Id_Curr INTO v_gl_set_of_books_id;
2028: CLOSE Fetch_Book_Id_Curr;
2029:
2030: 2 10/10/2003 Vijay Shankar for Bug# 3190872, FileVersion: 616.1
2031: Call to jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax is not invoked properly, which is made proper with this fix
2032:
2033: 3. 30/11/2005 Aparajita for bug#4036241. Version#115.1
2034:
2035: Introduced the call to centralized packaged procedure,

Line 2546: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION_BLANKET',

2542: v_quantity, v_line_amount , NVL( v_currency, v_hdr_curr ) ,
2543: v_assessable_value, v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, NULL, conv_rate ); -- Ravi for VAT*/
2544:
2545: /*5852041 ..commented the above and made call to ja_in_po_calc_tax*/
2546: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION_BLANKET',
2547: p_header_id => v_blanket_hdr,
2548: p_requisition_line_id => v_line_id ,
2549: P_line_id => v_po_line_id,
2550: p_line_location_id => v_line_location_id,

Line 2655: -- jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id, -999, -999, -999, ' ', v_line_amount, v_assessable_value, NULL, conv_rate );

2651:
2652: END IF; --pramasub FP 115.12
2653:
2654: -- following procedure call commented and modified in the next line by Vijay Shankar for Bug# 3190872
2655: -- jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id, -999, -999, -999, ' ', v_line_amount, v_assessable_value, NULL, conv_rate );
2656: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id,
2657: -999, -999, v_line_amount, v_uom_code, v_line_amount,
2658: v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, v_inventory_item_id, conv_rate ); */-- Ravi for VAT | commented by pramasub FP
2659:

Line 2656: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id,

2652: END IF; --pramasub FP 115.12
2653:
2654: -- following procedure call commented and modified in the next line by Vijay Shankar for Bug# 3190872
2655: -- jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id, -999, -999, -999, ' ', v_line_amount, v_assessable_value, NULL, conv_rate );
2656: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id,
2657: -999, -999, v_line_amount, v_uom_code, v_line_amount,
2658: v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, v_inventory_item_id, conv_rate ); */-- Ravi for VAT | commented by pramasub FP
2659:
2660: /*rchandan for bug#5852041. Commented the above and added the call to ja_in_po_calc_tax*/ --pramasub FP

Line 2661: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id,

2657: -999, -999, v_line_amount, v_uom_code, v_line_amount,
2658: v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, v_inventory_item_id, conv_rate ); */-- Ravi for VAT | commented by pramasub FP
2659:
2660: /*rchandan for bug#5852041. Commented the above and added the call to ja_in_po_calc_tax*/ --pramasub FP
2661: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id,
2662: -999, v_quantity, v_line_amount, v_uom_code, v_line_amount,
2663: v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, v_inventory_item_id, conv_rate ); -- Ravi for VAT*/
2664: --ja_in_po_calc_tax is FPed to jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax pramasub FP
2665: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION',

Line 2664: --ja_in_po_calc_tax is FPed to jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax pramasub FP

2660: /*rchandan for bug#5852041. Commented the above and added the call to ja_in_po_calc_tax*/ --pramasub FP
2661: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id,
2662: -999, v_quantity, v_line_amount, v_uom_code, v_line_amount,
2663: v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, v_inventory_item_id, conv_rate ); -- Ravi for VAT*/
2664: --ja_in_po_calc_tax is FPed to jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax pramasub FP
2665: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION',
2666: p_header_id => v_header_id,
2667: P_line_id => v_line_id,
2668: p_line_location_id => NULL,

Line 2665: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION',

2661: /*jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id,
2662: -999, v_quantity, v_line_amount, v_uom_code, v_line_amount,
2663: v_assessable_value,ln_vat_assess_value, v_inventory_item_id, conv_rate ); -- Ravi for VAT*/
2664: --ja_in_po_calc_tax is FPed to jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax pramasub FP
2665: jai_po_tax_pkg.calc_tax(p_type => 'REQUISITION',
2666: p_header_id => v_header_id,
2667: P_line_id => v_line_id,
2668: p_line_location_id => NULL,
2669: p_line_focus_id => NULL,

Line 3216: jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id, -999, -999, -999, ' ', v_line_tax_amount, v_assessable_value,

3212: WHERE Requisition_Header_Id = v_header_id
3213: AND Requisition_Line_Id = v_line_id
3214: AND Currency = NVL( v_currency, v_hdr_curr )
3215: AND Tax_Rate is Not Null;
3216: jai_po_tax_pkg.calculate_tax( 'REQUISITION', v_header_id, v_line_id, -999, -999, -999, ' ', v_line_tax_amount, v_assessable_value,
3217: ln_vat_assess_value, NULL, conv_rate
3218: -- , pn_gst_assessable_value => ln_gst_assessable_value
3219: ); -- Added by Jia for GST Bug#10091373 on 2010/09/10
3220: UPDATE JAI_PO_REQ_LINES