eTRM uses javascript that opens and focuses a separate window to display reports. Your browser does not appear to support javascript. This should not prevent you from using eTRM but it does mean the window focus feature will not work. Please check the contents of other windows on your desktop if you click on a link that does not appear to do anything.

APPS.JAI_RCV_TRX_PROCESSING_PKG dependencies on JAI_RCV_EXCISE_PROCESSING_PKG

Line 83: - Modified the condition which if satisfied makes a call to jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction

79: - Calls to transaction_preprocessor and transaction_postprocessed are made to do processing required before and after
80: actual processing
81: - Changes in PROCESS_TRANSACTION procedure
82: - Opened up the code to execute procedure for all localization supported receiving transactions
83: - Modified the condition which if satisfied makes a call to jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction
84: - Added p_process_special_reason, p_process_special_qty parameters in call to jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction
85: - Modified POPULATE_DETAILS procedure to populate tax_transaction_id and third_party_flag values. Tax_Transaction_id is the
86: transaction_id related to parent transaction for which taxes are defaulted/attached. usually this is either RECEIVE or MATCH trx
87: - Also changes are made to update ja_in_rcv_transaction.transaction_type to RECEIVE incase of MATCH transaction

Line 84: - Added p_process_special_reason, p_process_special_qty parameters in call to jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction

80: actual processing
81: - Changes in PROCESS_TRANSACTION procedure
82: - Opened up the code to execute procedure for all localization supported receiving transactions
83: - Modified the condition which if satisfied makes a call to jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction
84: - Added p_process_special_reason, p_process_special_qty parameters in call to jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction
85: - Modified POPULATE_DETAILS procedure to populate tax_transaction_id and third_party_flag values. Tax_Transaction_id is the
86: transaction_id related to parent transaction for which taxes are defaulted/attached. usually this is either RECEIVE or MATCH trx
87: - Also changes are made to update ja_in_rcv_transaction.transaction_type to RECEIVE incase of MATCH transaction
88: - Modifed VALIDATE_TRANSACTION to function properly. In this procedure different validations are applied that are

Line 536: Fix : Call to procedure jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction is made even for a receipt

532: generated.
533:
534: 47. 03-Oct-2012 vkavulur Bug#13362352
535: Issue : RG IS NOT GETTING REVERSED FOR OSP ITEM RECEIPT ON DELIVER
536: Fix : Call to procedure jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction is made even for a receipt
537: having destination type as 'SHOP FLOOR' to reverse the quantity in RG
538: 48. 07-nov-12 vkaranam for bug#14346451
539: Issue: RG registers are getting updated if the item is not excisable
540: fix :online_qty_flag is set depending on the item_excisable_flag

Line 599: r_tax jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.tax_breakup;

595: WHERE transaction_id = cp_transaction_id;
596:
597: r_trx c_trx%ROWTYPE;
598: r_base_trx c_base_trx%ROWTYPE;
599: r_tax jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.tax_breakup;
600:
601: ln_cenvat_amount NUMBER;
602: ln_other_cenvat_amt NUMBER;
603: lv_breakup_type VARCHAR2(10);

Line 659: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.get_tax_amount_breakup(

655: IF r_trx.organization_type = 'T' THEN
656: lv_breakup_type := 'RG23D';
657: END IF;
658:
659: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.get_tax_amount_breakup(
660: p_shipment_line_id => r_trx.shipment_line_id,
661: p_transaction_id => r_trx.transaction_id,
662: p_curr_conv_rate => r_trx.currency_conversion_rate,
663: pr_tax => r_tax,

Line 709: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.other_cenvat_rg_recording(

705: );
706:
707: -- Vijay Shankar for Bug#3940588 EDUCATION CESS
708: IF r_tax.excise_edu_cess <> 0 THEN
709: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.other_cenvat_rg_recording(
710: p_source_register => jai_constants.reg_receipt_cenvat,
711: p_source_register_id => r_trx.transaction_id,
712: p_tax_type => jai_constants.tax_type_exc_edu_cess,
713: p_credit => r_tax.excise_edu_cess,

Line 725: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.other_cenvat_rg_recording(

721: RETURN;
722: END IF;
723: /*Added by kunkumar for forward porting bug#5989740, start*/
724: IF r_tax.sh_exc_edu_cess <> 0 THEN
725: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.other_cenvat_rg_recording(
726: p_source_register => jai_constants.reg_receipt_cenvat,
727: p_source_register_id => r_trx.transaction_id,
728: p_tax_type => jai_constants.tax_type_sh_exc_edu_cess,
729: p_credit => r_tax.sh_exc_edu_cess,

Line 741: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.other_cenvat_rg_recording(

737: RETURN;
738: END IF;
739:
740: IF r_tax.sh_cvd_edu_cess <> 0 THEN
741: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.other_cenvat_rg_recording(
742: p_source_register => jai_constants.reg_receipt_cenvat,
743: p_source_register_id => r_trx.transaction_id,
744: p_tax_type => jai_constants.tax_type_sh_cvd_edu_cess,
745: p_credit => r_tax.sh_cvd_edu_cess,

Line 760: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.other_cenvat_rg_recording(

756:
757:
758:
759: IF r_tax.cvd_edu_cess <> 0 THEN
760: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.other_cenvat_rg_recording(
761: p_source_register => jai_constants.reg_receipt_cenvat,
762: p_source_register_id => r_trx.transaction_id,
763: p_tax_type => jai_constants.tax_type_cvd_edu_cess,
764: p_credit => r_tax.cvd_edu_cess,

Line 1026: r_tax jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.tax_breakup;

1022: lv_codepath VARCHAR2(1996);
1023: ln_processed_cnt NUMBER(10); --File.Sql.35 Cbabu := 0;
1024: ln_errored_cnt NUMBER(10); --File.Sql.35 Cbabu := 0;
1025:
1026: r_tax jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.tax_breakup;
1027: lv_breakup_type VARCHAR2(15);
1028:
1029: lv_ttype_correct JAI_RCV_TRANSACTIONS.transaction_type%type ;
1030: lv_ttype_deliver JAI_RCV_TRANSACTIONS.transaction_type%type ;

Line 1180: lv_process_special_reason := jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.second_50ptg_claim;

1176: END IF;
1177:
1178: IF lv_2nd_claim_flag = 'Y' THEN
1179: ln_qty_to_claim := r_receipt_cenvat_dtl.quantity_for_2nd_claim;
1180: lv_process_special_reason := jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.second_50ptg_claim;
1181: END IF;
1182:
1183: process_transaction(
1184: p_transaction_id => temp_rec.transaction_id,

Line 1285: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.get_tax_amount_breakup(

1281: lv_breakup_type := 'RG23D';
1282: END IF;
1283:
1284: lv_codepath := jai_general_pkg.plot_codepath(21, lv_codepath);
1285: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.get_tax_amount_breakup(
1286: p_shipment_line_id => loop_trx.shipment_line_id,
1287: p_transaction_id => loop_trx.transaction_id,
1288: p_curr_conv_rate => r_trx.currency_conversion_rate,
1289: pr_tax => r_tax, -- OUT Variable with Breakup

Line 2998: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.rtv_processing_for_ssi(

2994: END IF;
2995:
2996: /* following procedure call is a replacement for SSI functinoality of JAINRTVN. This is created due to DFF removal */
2997: if lv_excise_processing_reqd = jai_constants.yes and rtv_rec.receipt_excise_rate <> rtv_rec.rtv_excise_rate then
2998: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.rtv_processing_for_ssi(
2999: pn_transaction_id => rtv_rec.transaction_id,
3000: pv_codepath => lv_codepath,
3001: pv_process_status => lv_ssi_cenvat_rg_flag,
3002: pv_process_message => lv_ssi_cenvat_rg_message

Line 3314: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.rg_i_entry(

3310: ELSE
3311: lv_qty_register_entry_type := 'Cr'; /* Reverted back the code for Bug #13110424 */
3312: END IF;
3313:
3314: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.rg_i_entry(
3315: p_transaction_id => r_trx.transaction_id,
3316: pr_tax => NULL,
3317: p_register_entry_type => lv_qty_register_entry_type, /*bug 7662347*/
3318: p_register_id => ln_part_i_register_id,

Line 3335: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.derive_cgin_scenario(

3331: FND_FILE.put_line(FND_FILE.log, 'Register Type:'||lv_register_type);
3332:
3333: -- to determine the way in which CGIN Items are Processed
3334: IF lv_register_type = 'C' THEN
3335: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.derive_cgin_scenario(
3336: p_transaction_id => p_transaction_id,
3337: p_cgin_code => lv_cgin_code,
3338: p_process_status => lv_process_status,
3339: p_process_message => lv_process_message,

Line 3359: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.rg23_part_i_entry(

3355: ELSE
3356: lv_qty_register_entry_type := 'Cr';
3357: END IF;
3358:
3359: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.rg23_part_i_entry(
3360: p_transaction_id => r_trx.transaction_id,
3361: pr_tax => NULL,
3362: p_register_entry_type => lv_qty_register_entry_type, /*bug 7662347*/
3363: p_register_id => ln_part_i_register_id,

Line 3400: OR (p_process_special_reason = jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.second_50ptg_claim AND ln_cenvat_claimed_ptg < 100)

3396: )
3397: -- following condition will be satisfied during 2nd 50% claim of CGIN items when called from JAINMVAT form
3398: -- Vijay Shankar for Bug#3940588. RECEIPTS DEPLUG
3399: OR (p_called_from='JAINMVAT' AND r_trx.cenvat_rg_status='Y')
3400: OR (p_process_special_reason = jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.second_50ptg_claim AND ln_cenvat_claimed_ptg < 100)
3401: )
3402: THEN
3403:
3404: SAVEPOINT process_cenvat_rg_flag;

Line 3416: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction(

3412: -- this call passes the cenvat related accounting and register entries based on transaction type
3413: lv_statement_id := '8';
3414: p_codepath := jai_general_pkg.plot_codepath(9, p_codepath);
3415:
3416: jai_rcv_excise_processing_pkg.process_transaction(
3417: p_transaction_id => p_transaction_id,
3418: p_process_status => p_cenvat_rg_flag,
3419: p_cenvat_claimed_ptg => ln_cenvat_claimed_ptg,
3420: p_process_message => p_cenvat_rg_message,