Search Results csf_debrief_task_assignments




Overview
Explore in AI Chat

Overview

The APPS.CSF_DEBRIEF_TASK_ASSIGNMENTS package body is a component of the Oracle E-Business Suite Field Service (CSF) module, which handles the debriefing process for field service tasks performed by technicians. In the Oracle EBS 12.1.1 and 12.2.2 releases, this package is classified under the ETRM (E-Business Suite Technical Reference Manual) as an OTHER API type. Its principal role is to provide a programmatic interface for recording and maintaining the outcome data associated with a task assignment that has been executed in the field. When a field service technician completes work and the assignment details are captured during debrief, records such as actual execution dates and status transitions must be persisted. This package encapsulates that update logic behind a callable PL/SQL interface.

The package source header (csfptkab.pls 120.0, dated 2005/05/24) indicates a long-standing, stable artifact carried forward across EBS point releases. Notably, both documented procedures contain placeholder (null;) bodies, indicating that this package as shipped is a stub or shell intended to be extended or that the functional implementation resides elsewhere. Consultants should therefore treat the package as an interface contract rather than an active business-logic implementation in the base release.

Key Procedures and Functions

The ETRM metadata documents two program units within this package body:

  • UPDATE_TASK_ASSIGNMENT — The primary procedure, matching the user's search term. It exposes the API for updating a debrief task assignment. Its documented parameter profile includes an API version identifier, an object version number for optimistic locking, the target task assignment identifier, actual start and end dates, an assignment status identifier, and standard output parameters for return status, message count, and message data. The presence of l_RETURN_STATUS, l_MSG_COUNT, and l_MSG_DATA follows the standard Oracle EBS API error-handling convention (analogous to FND_API.G_RET_STS_SUCCESS semantics). As shipped, the body executes null;, performing no database operation.
  • CTACCTINFO — A helper function accepting a party identifier and an account identifier and returning a VARCHAR2 value. It is likely intended to derive or format account information related to the assignment context. Its body is likewise unimplemented (null;) in the documented release.

Tables Accessed

The ETRM metadata provided for this package does not list any referenced tables via APPS synonyms. This is consistent with the placeholder nature of the procedure bodies: because no DML is executed, no table dependencies are recorded. Functionally, a completed implementation of UPDATE_TASK_ASSIGNMENT would be expected to write to the CSF debrief/task assignment base tables (for example, the task assignment and assignment status entities), updating actual start and end dates and the assignment status identifier. However, such access is not documented in the supplied metadata and should not be assumed for the shipped version.

Usage Notes

Because the package is classified as OTHER and referenced by zero other packages, it is not a mandatory dependency within the CSF module chain. It would typically be invoked from a customized or extended debrief workflow, from a client extension or form personalization, or from custom PL/SQL code that requires a standardized signature for updating task assignments. Integrators should note the following:

  • The presence of an object version number and API version parameter indicates the interface was designed for version-tolerant invocation; callers should supply the correct version to avoid future incompatibility.
  • Error handling should inspect l_RETURN_STATUS and l_MSG_DATA rather than relying on exceptions, consistent with EBS API conventions.
  • Given the stub implementation, any deployment requiring real update behavior must supply a replacement or extension; the base package will silently succeed without modifying data.
  • Version differences between 12.1.1 and 12.2.2 should be validated against the specific ETRM revision, as the API signature shown reflects file version 120.0 and may have been extended in later patches.