Search Results process_rfcin_notification

Overview

M4U_RESP_PROCESS is an Oracle E-Business Suite PL/SQL package body owned by the APPS schema that supports the response-handling layer of the Collaborative Network (CLN) integration used by Oracle's supply chain collaboration functionality. The package processes inbound collaboration messages and notifications exchanged between the enterprise and its trading partners, resolving responses against collaborative document identifiers and logging the outcome to collaboration history. It functions as the receiving counterpart to notification-generation logic, translating partner acknowledgements, batch responses, and trade-item replies into application state changes. The object is documented as VALID and classified as OTHER rather than as a public API, indicating internal use within the collaboration flow rather than an interface intended for external callers. Consistent with that classification, the package is not referenced by any other database object, so its procedures are entered through event subscriptions or scheduled processing rather than through dependency chains from other PL/SQL units.

Key Procedures and Functions

The package exposes eleven documented procedures:

• PROCESS_CIC_NOTIFICATION — handles inbound Collaborative Integration Center notification messages.
• PROCESS_CIC_ADDITIONAL_INFO — processes supplementary information messages returned in addition to a primary notification.
• PROCESS_CIC_TRADE_ITEM — processes responses directed at the individual trade-item level within a collaboration document.
• PROCESS_RCIR_NOTIFICATION — processes Retail Collaborative Item Response notifications.
• PROCESS_RCIR_BATCH_LIST — handles responses delivered as a batch list rather than as single messages.
• PROCESS_RCIR_ACK — records acknowledgements returned for RCIR messages.
• PROCESS_RCIR_BATCH_ACK — records acknowledgements returned at batch level.
• PROCESS_RCIN_ACK — records acknowledgement responses for RCIN messages.
• PROCESS_RFCIN_NOTIFICATION — processes RFCIN notification responses.
• PROCESS_WLQ_RESPONSE — processes responses associated with workflow or worklist queue processing.
• ADD_ERROR_TO_CLN_HIST — a shared utility that appends error information to the collaboration history record for the message being processed.

The procedures share a common pattern: parse the inbound response, resolve the originating collaboration message, apply or record the response, and write an audit entry, invoking ADD_ERROR_TO_CLN_HIST when validation or processing fails.

Tables Accessed

The package operates against the following documented objects, referenced through APPS synonyms: CLN_COLLABORATION_MSG_ID_S, the sequence supplying collaboration message identifiers; CLN_COLL_HDR, the collaboration history header table that stores processing outcomes and error text; WF_PARAMETER_LIST_T, the Workflow parameter list type used to receive and pass event payloads; and DUAL for trivial scalar evaluation. The sequence is central to the response flow because the user search term, CLN_COLLABORATION_MSG_ID_S, is the same object referenced in these dependencies. It provides the unique key that ties an inbound response to its collaboration message and, in turn, to the history row written by ADD_ERROR_TO_CLN_HIST.

Usage Notes

M4U_RESP_PROCESS depends on CLN_CH_COLLABORATION_PKG, CLN_DEBUG_PUB, EGO_UCCNET_EVENTS_PUB, FND_API, FND_PROFILE, M4U_UCC_UTILS, and WF_EVENT, confirming that it executes inside the Oracle Workflow event system and is therefore invoked asynchronously by Oracle Business Events or by subscription-based deferred processing rather than by direct user action. It is not called from Oracle Forms or concurrent programs through a documented interface, and no other package references it. Because it is a package body with no documented specification as a published API, the correct treatment for EBS 12.1.1 and 12.2.2 is to regard it as internal framework code: debugging output is routed through CLN_DEBUG_PUB, profile-controlled behaviour through FND_PROFILE, and errors are persisted to collaboration history. Customizations should subscribe to the standard collaboration events rather than invoke these procedures directly, since procedure signatures are not published and may change with patching.