Search Results rlm_message_sv




Overview
Explore in AI Chat

Overview

RLM_MESSAGE_SV is an APPS-owned PL/SQL package within the Oracle E-Business Suite Release Management (RLM) module, which supports Oracle's order management, returns, and channel revenue flows for high-volume distribution and fulfillment operations. In EBS 12.1.1 and 12.2.2, the package serves as the centralized message-handling and error-reporting utility layer for the RLM service (SV) packages. Rather than each RLM service package independently accumulating and emitting errors, diagnostics, and status messages, RLM_MESSAGE_SV provides a shared repository and API through which dependent packages register messages, signal dependency state, and report fatal conditions. The package is documented with a status of VALID and is classified as an "OTHER" API, meaning it is not a published public interface but an internal utility invoked by peer packages within the RLM schema. Its broad dependency footprint — referenced by roughly fifteen other RLM_SV packages — confirms its role as a shared infrastructure component rather than a user-facing business API.

Key Procedures and Functions

The ETRM metadata documents approximately twenty procedures and functions. The principal ones include:

  • INITIALIZE_MESSAGES / INITIALIZE_DEPENDENCY — Reset the message buffer and dependency-tracking state at the start of a processing run, ensuring no stale messages or dependency flags carry over from a prior invocation.
  • SET_DEPENDENT_ERROR / CHECK_DEPENDENCY / RESET_DEPENDENCY — Manage a dependency model in which one stage of processing depends on the successful outcome of a prior stage. CHECK_DEPENDENCY determines whether a prerequisite failed, while SET_DEPENDENT_ERROR records a cascading error against the dependent step.
  • SET_FATAL_ERROR / FATAL_ERROR_FOUND — Mark and test a fatal condition that should short-circuit further processing within the calling package.
  • DUMP_MESSAGES / REMOVEMESSAGES — Flush accumulated messages to their destination and clear them from the buffer, respectively. These control the lifecycle of a message from accumulation to emission.
  • POPULATE_REQ_ID / GET_CONC_REQ_ID — Capture and retrieve the concurrent request identifier so messages can be correlated to the concurrent program submission that generated them.
  • INSERT_PURGE_ROW — Insert a record used by the purge routine, supporting housekeeping of obsolete message or interface data.
  • NAME — A utility function typically returning the name of the calling object or message context.

Tables Accessed

Because RLM_MESSAGE_SV is a message and dependency utility, its table access is modest relative to the transactional RLM packages. It references RLM_INTERFACE_HEADERS, RLM_INTERFACE_LINES, and RLM_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL, the staging structures through which inbound demand and order data are loaded, and RLM_DEMAND_EXCEPTIONS with RLM_DEMAND_EXCEPTIONS_S, which store exception records raised during demand processing. It also touches PLITBLM, the standard EBS PL/SQL table used for in-memory message buffering, and the RLM_INTERFACE structures for correlation of messages to interface rows. References to HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS, HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES, HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL, HZ_PARTIES, MTL_CUSTOMER_ITEMS, and MTL_CUSTOMER_ITEM_XREFS are reached indirectly through the calling RLM_SV packages, which resolve customer and item context before routing messages through this package.

Usage Notes

RLM_MESSAGE_SV is not invoked directly by end users. It is called programmatically by the RLM service packages — including RLM_AD_SV, RLM_BLANKET_SV, RLM_CORE_SV, RLM_CUM_SV, RLM_DP_SV, RLM_EXTINTERFACE_SV, RLM_FORECAST_SV, RLM_MANAGE_DEMAND_SV, RLM_PS_SV, RLM_RD_SV, RLM_REPLACE_SV, RLM_SETUP_TERMS_SV, RLM_SHIP_DELIVERY_PATTERN_SV, RLM_VALIDATEDEMAND_SV, and RLM_WF_SV — which call its initialization routines before processing, register errors as they occur, and dump messages upon completion. In practice these callers are executed from concurrent programs and from RLM-related forms. Customizations that extend RLM processing should follow the same pattern: initialize messages, register dependency and fatal errors through this API, then dump and purge. Because the package is internal and not a published interface, direct custom calls should be treated as unsupported and evaluated against each patch level.